From ???@??? Thu Sep 18 16:44:34 2008 Return-Path:
X-Original-To: Isp402@dsl.Isp2.com X-Envelope-To: Isp402@dsl.Isp2.com Delivered-To: Isp402@dsl.Isp2.com Received: from grand.systems.Isp2.net (grand.systems.Isp2.net [220.127.116.11]) by earthshaker.systems.Isp2.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A484E00008D for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:44:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailgate.Isp5.com (mx7.Isp5.co.uk [18.104.22.168]) by grand.systems.Isp2.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FBD218000083 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:44:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from [22.214.171.124] (helo=smtp2b.orange.fr) by mailgate.Isp5.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1KgLgL-0002wk-Ov for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 11:44:38 -0400 Received: from User (234.Red-80-59-228.staticIP.rima-tde.net [126.96.36.199]) by mwinf2b13.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id ED6F6A002DB4; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:44:31 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20080918154431972.ED6F6A002DB4@mwinf2b13.orange.fr Reply-To: From: "Ewald de Bever (Mr)," Subject: You have not responded to my previous letter Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:44:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20080918154431.ED6F6A002DB4@mwinf2b13.orange.fr> To: undisclosed-recipients:; X-Antivirus-Scanner-Outbound: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-Spam-Score: 7.7
You have not responded to my previous letter sent two weeks ago by regular mail in which I expressed my grave concerns about an investment of a member of your family.
As you already know, I am the Information Analyst at the SNS Bank of Netherlands and presently in London, the United Kingdom on official assignments. I am contacting you via email because you have not responded to my previous letter and I do hope you will give this matter a priority attention it truly deserved.
I would respectfully request that you treat the contents of this mail as privileged and proprietary and respect the integrity of the information you come by as a result of this correspondence because am contacting you independently of our investigation and no one is informed of this communication. Hence, I would like to intimate you with certain facts that I believe would be of interest to you and mutually beneficial if pursued to its conclusion with the necessary speed and determination.
The bank is at the verge to closing an investment account of high value belonging apparently to your family member who reportedly died intestate five years ago leaving behind an estate/capital with interest of a substantial amount of money in a now bonded account at the SNS Bank of Netherlands and till date nobody has come forward or put application for the claim. In line with our internal processes for account holders who have passed away, we officially instituted our own investigations in good faith to determine who should have right to claim the estate. This investigation has for the past months been unfruitful. Hence, my official capacity dictates that I am the only party to supervise the investigation and just recently, it occurred to me that you and I could work on this matter and share the proceeds equally being that you both share the same last name which put you in the right position to be the only suitable apparent heir of the estate though you may not be biological
ly related to him.