Example 419 Email Fraud 1635
From ???@??? Fri Jul 17 19:18:33 2009
Return-path:
Envelope-to: Isp402@dsl.Isp2.com
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:16:02 +0100
Received: from mk-filter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.139.137.133])
by mk-delivery-4.b2b.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from )
id 1MRsuY-00063X-AC
for Isp402@dsl.Isp2.com; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:16:02 +0100
Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=72.1.194.111;
receiver=mk-inboundfilter-2-a-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com;
envelope-from="chrisvn@sns.nl";
x-sender="chrisvn@sns.nl";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=72.1.194.111;
receiver=mk-inboundfilter-2-a-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com;
envelope-from="chrisvn@sns.nl";
x-sender="chrisvn@sns.nl";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=72.1.194.111;
receiver=mk-inboundfilter-2-a-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com;
envelope-from="chrisvn@sns.nl";
x-sender="postmaster@mailgate.Isp5.com";
x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-Trace: 1209023364/mk-filter-6.mail.uk.tiscali.com/ListenerSBRS/$ACCEPTED/UNKNOWNLIST/72.1.194.111/2.8/chrisvn@sns.nl
X-SBRS: 2.8
Received: from mx4.Isp5.co.uk (HELO mailgate.Isp5.com) ([72.1.194.111])
by mk-inboundfilter-2-a-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2009 20:15:54 +0100
Received: from [192.115.104.8] (helo=omr1.bezeqint.net)
by mailgate.Isp5.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian))
id 1MRsuN-0006jq-1e
for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:15:52 -0400
Received: from m7.bezeqint.net (m7.bezeqint.net [192.115.104.87])
by omr1.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with ESMTP id 1D39D1620D3;
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:18:49 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from User ([66.11.194.202])
by m7.bezeqint.net (MOS 3.10.3-GA)
with ESMTP id JCB19098 (AUTH INBAL244@BEZEQINT.NET);
Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:16:52 +0300 (IDT)
Message-Id: <200907171816.JCB19098@m7.bezeqint.net>
X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1,
source=Queried,
refid=0001.0A0B0302.4A60BFC9.016E,
actions=mailhurdle tag
Reply-To:
From: "Chris V"
To: chrisveenl@rediffmail.com
Subject: Be advised accordingly
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:18:33 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1251"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Junkmail: UCE(50)
X-Junkmail-Status: score=50/50, host=m7.bezeqint.net
X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=bulk(0),
refid=str=0001.0A0B0202.4A608A6D.00EE,ss=3,sh,fgs=0,
ip=66.11.194.202,
so=2008-09-22 23:22:13,
dmn=5.7.1/2009-06-05,
mode=single engine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Antivirus-Scanner-Outbound: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
X-Spam-Score: 5.1
MAIL REFERENCE: SNS/38493484/NL/09
BE ADVISED ACCORDINGLY.
My previous mail was not responded to and found it necessary to write you once more regarding this subject matter.
Be informed that our search revealed your last name to be same with a customer of the SNS Bank N.V whom we have been tracing his relatives for years to no avail. The benefit from the deceased assets worth millions of dollars is overdue for payment.
As the head of Compensation and Benefits department, your last name can be accepted for a heir to this amount of money. You need not worry about the legal requirements as you shall be closely guided and directed on this.
Due to the sensitive nature of this claim process,it is in the best interest of success that you keep this to yourself for now unless advised otherwise later.